Showing posts with label Hillary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hillary. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Hold On a Little Longer


The nomination is over.
Barack Obama is the nominee. 
John McCain is the enemy, not Hillary Clinton. 

Repeat these simple affirmations to yourself each morning, as you brush your teeth and each night before you go to bed. It can be hard to remember that they're true in this slow motion waiting game.  

Pennsylvania, maddeningly, changes nothing. Obama still has a small, but insurmountable lead in pledged delegates, and a small but nearly insurmountable lead in the popular vote. This is not a landslide win, but it's a clear one, and Pennsylvania only delayed the day until we can officially recognize it. If Obama wins Indiana, that day is May 7th. If not, that day is June 4th. But the day is coming. Hillary shouldn't pull out. It has been a very long and yes, very close campaign, which has highlighted the huge problems with our primary system. Florida and Michigan shouldn't have moved their primaries. But under the rules, Obama has won.

Hillary should get back to what she does best: talking policy. She should be pushing Obama to accept her superior Health Care Plan. She should be using these weeks to shape the Democratic platform for the fall, much as John Edwards, with a way lower profile, was able to frame the nomination contest. At least until Mark Penn ripped the frame off and threw it away.

Americans may not have been excited about John Edwards, but now they are dying for his kind of campaign, the kind that talks about a new vision for the country. That tackles issues head on with passion and gusto. And that's the kind of campaign that would lay the groundwork for a broad coalition that will deliver our party the White House, and the government for years to come. Hillary could and should be a great leader of that movement, writing legislation and leading congress

But instead of making the campaign about the future, the Clintons are still trying to pull off a coup by Karl Rove style hatchet job as the Times editors write this morning: 
Ultimately we Democrats have the same goals, we're having a.... ahem... bitter.... fight about how best to acheive them. Obama really does want universal health care, even though his plan to do it was poorly thrown together. Hillary really does want to get our troops out of Iraq, even though she too often talks like a neocon. Americans want those things. John McCain does not. Democrats have to talk that way. Obama did it in his speech last night. Hillary is still campaigning in the weird, 2002-like dimension where Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopolous live.



Attacking McCain, United Democrats Present Bold Platform
We can make that the storyline tomorrow. But we have to move on from this fight. 

It was close, but it is over.


Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Quick thoughts on Pennsylvania

It's interesting just how dramatic the demographic breakdowns are. As Middlebury professor Dickinson suggested in an email to some of his students, bittergate didn't really matter, what ultimately mattered where voter demographics. This race is very much based on personality, ethnicity and gender, not policy. To play devil's advocate for these Pennsylvania voters, however, it could be argued that since there isn't much difference in the policy of these two candidates, what really distinguished them is personality, and yes gender and ethnicity.

Regardless, Obama's lead seems to be insurmountable and I'm not saying Clinton should drop out, just that the attacks need to stop. Using fear is just setting up McCain for November.

Finally, I'm also afraid (as everyone is) that this will keep going until the convention.

Josh Marshall puts the results of Pennsylvania most clearly:

I'd say the real story is that this leaves us basically where we were.


So when will this end?

Friday, November 16, 2007

Debate: Las Vegas, November 15, 2007

So there was another Democratic Debate last night, and, in case you missed it because of midterms, I think general consensus is that you didn't miss much. General conclusions are that no one gained any ground, but no one really lost any. Hillary probably redeemed herself in the eyes of her supporters, but Obama and Edwards were aggressive enough to probably prevent her from gaining any ground. I think, I general, people were expecting more from Obama and a little less from Edwards than what ended up happening. Further more, some of the best performances were by Biden and Dodd. Too bad the race isn't about them any more. And finally, there was Blitzer. Hmm...It's suddenly becoming clear that there were several motivations for CNN to hold the YouTube debates.

Here are a few blog articles worth reading if you're still curious:
http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=2402
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2007/11/disclosure-by-digby-cnn-roundtable.html
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/11/the-debate.html

Otherwise, here are a few of the highlights:

OBAMA: The only difference between Senator Clinton's health care plan and mine is that she thinks the problem for people without health care is that nobody has mandated, forced them to get health care. What I see are people who would love to have health care. They desperately want it. But the problem is they can't afford it.

***

CLINTON: And this pantsuit, it's asbestos tonight.

***

BIDEN: Oh no, no, no, no.

BLITZER: Senator Biden, I want you to weigh in.

BIDEN: Don't do it, no! Don't make me speak!

***

BIDEN: But look, folks, let's get straight to it here. This is not about experience. It's not about change. It's about action. Who among us is going to be able to, on day one, step in and end the war? Who among us understands what to do about Pakistan? Who among us is going to pick up the phone and immediately interface with Putin and lay off Georgia because Saakashvili is in real trouble?

***

EDWARDS: When is our party going to show a little backbone and strength and courage and speak up for those people who have been left behind?

***

RICHARDSON: Well, by the way, I'm Bill Richardson. I'm Governor of New Mexico. And nice to meet you all.

***

BLITZER: Are you ready to commit, absolutely, positively that you will support the Democratic nominee, no matter who that nominee is? No ifs, ands or buts. Senator Edwards?

EDWARDS: Is that a planted question?

BLITZER: Yes, I planted it.

EDWARDS: Yes, I absolutely will support the Democratic nominee for president.

DODD: Absolutely.

CLINTON: Absolutely, yes.

KUCINICH: Only if they oppose war as an instrument of policy.

RICHARDSON: Yes, I will support the nominee.

BIDEN: Hell, no, I wouldn't support any of these guys. No, I'm joking. Of course, I'm for them all.